In one YouTube comment thread an atheist has asked this question: ‘Which god? I like Zeus… Can I study his word as the one and only truth? Odds are he’s as right as Yahweh is or Allah or Odin or Shiva or Osiris or… You get the point’
So the most crucial question is: which god? Because there are thousands of gods which man has imagined so far. Out of so many gods, which one is the true god?
Actually there can be only one true God, a God who has created the universe. The answer is as simple as that.
But how do we come to know that out of these thousands of gods which particular god has actually created the universe?
There is an easy way out. First determine what will be the attributes of a creator god. Then find out which god out of these thousands of gods has these particular attributes of a creator god. Then that god will be the true god.
So our next question will be: what are the attributes of this creator God?
Anybody can find out what will be the attributes of this creator God if he/she is intelligent enough and if he/she can use his/her brain and logic properly.
Here no spoon-feeding from the big peers is required at all. One’s own intelligence is sufficient for this purpose.
Universe has been created by God.
Universe primarily means its space, time, matter and energy.
So universe created by God will mean its space, time, matter and energy has been created by God.
That will further mean that before creation by God there was no space, no time, no matter and no energy.
That will again mean that before creation God was in no space and time and that God did not contain any matter and energy.
That is the reason as to why theists always describe their God as spaceless, timeless and immaterial.
So a creator God will always be spaceless, timeless and immaterial, because this is the one and the only one logically possible consequence of being the creator of a universe.
Now let us ask ourselves this question: have Zeus, Ganesha, Poseidon, Santa, Easter Bunny, Odin, Thor, Shiva, Appollo, Osiris or any other mythical gods that we can think of, ever been described as spaceless, timeless and immaterial?
If not, then none of these mythical gods can qualify himself as a probable candidate for the post of this creator God, because logic dictates that a creator God will always be spaceless, timeless and immaterial.
But God of almost all the major religions all over the world has been repeatedly described as spaceless and timeless.
Actually spacelessness and timelessness are the two most common major attributes of God of the religions throughout the world. Mystics who claim that they have direct encounter with God have also described their God as spaceless and timeless.
But where is the evidence that there is such a creator God?
Scientists have also faithfully served the purpose of this creator God by showing as to how it is possible to be spaceless and timeless (SR), whereas they could also have shown just the opposite, that no one or nothing could be spaceless and timeless.
Yes, they could also have shown that no one or nothing could be spaceless and timeless if it was the job of the scientists to manufacture truth.
In that case they could have very easily falsified science and shown that no one or nothing could be spaceless and timeless.
In that case all our arguments for a creator God would have stopped then and there.
But it is not the job of the scientists to manufacture truth but to discover it. So they had to show what they were supposed to show: THE TRUTH AS IT IS.
So they had to show how it is possible to be spaceless and timeless.
Thus they have failed to suppress the truth that it is really possible to be spaceless and timeless.
It is most important for us believers that science has failed to suppress the truth that it is possible to be spaceless and timeless.
[Here, am I not insulting the whole scientific community by suggesting that they can even think of suppressing any scientific truth?
No, hereby I am merely uttering one bitter truth about some modern day scientists who so vehemently deny the existence of God that practically nothing is impossible for them, not even suppressing some scientific truth that may eventually point to a creator God.]
By showing how it is possible to be spaceless and timeless, science has actually given its validation to our concept of a spaceless and timeless God. It has indirectly said here that from the scientific point of view it is not impossible for someone to be spaceless and timeless.
Logic dictates that a creator God will always be spaceless and timeless and science has also given its full support to this logical conclusion by showing as to how it is possible to be spaceless and timeless. Based on their personal experience mystics have also repeatedly said that God is spaceless and timeless.
Thus logic, science and mystics’ personal experience – all the three converge here and point to a single entity: creator God.
Based on this fact alone it can safely be said that mathematics of SR points to a creator God whose two major attributes are his spacelessness and timelessness.
If this creator God does not exist at all, then why was it necessary for science to show as to how it is possible to be spaceless and timeless? Why has it not shown just the opposite of what it has actually shown? That no one/nothing can be spaceless and timeless? Who, or what, compelled it to show what it has actually shown here? Was it the TRUTH itself?
When I have pointed out to some atheists that God is called spaceless and timeless and that in SR science has also shown how it is possible to be spaceless and timeless, they have desperately tried to falsify science. One can go through the below links to see it oneself:
If these atheists really think that there is no evidence for the existence of any gods and so there is no reason to believe in anybody’s god, then why this urge to falsify science?